I think all the options you have listed are really quite decent, and
for what it seems, budget is no real object. As such, stick with the
OEM Pentax lenses.
re: 14mm, I find that 20mm is the widest that I could ever find a practical
use for... and 24mm was probably more useful 50% of the time, anyway.
Hence , I think the uses for a 14mm (which I borrowed several times) is
too limited for consideration unless you already have a lens in the 20-24mm
range.
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:42:12 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Wide Angle Lens Dilemma
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
- --=_alternative 005FECA7C1256A61_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have been saving up to buy a good ultra wide angle lens. Below is my
shortlist (in no particular order).
- - PENTAX SMC-FA 20-35mm f/4 AL
- - PENTAX SMC-FA 20mm f/2.8
- - SIGMA 20mm f/1.8 EX DG Aspherical RF
- - SIGMA 14mm f2.8 EX Aspherical
- - SIGMA 17-35mm f2.8-4 EX Aspherical
Since whatever I choose the investment will be substantial, I would like
some expert advice on the issue. My priorities are as follows:
1) Sharpness (duh!)
2) Good rendition of out of focus areas.
3) As little barrel/pincushion distortion as possible.
4) Good resistance to flare.
5) Non rotating front element. - I frequently use a circular polariser
and other Cokin P System filters.
6) Fast Maximum Aperture - Since I will stop down the lens to f8 or f11 in
most situations this is not absolutely essential.
7) Zoom - desirable but not essential.
Any words of wisdom / personal experience will be very apreceated. I
would also be interested in positive experiences with lenses other than
those on my shortlist.
My camera is a Pentax MZ5n
Regards
Patrick
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
