First, let me thank all who replied to my post for the great feedback.
Since I like using filters esp my circular polariser a non rotating front element is highly desirable. I know that the sigma 20mm and the 17-35 both have non rotating front elements. But don't couldnt find the relevant info on the Pentax 20mm and 20-35.
I was initially undecided whether to include the 14mm in my shortlist, but now I've decided to drop it, it is probably a tad too wide for my liking.
With respect to cost the price difference between the sigma and pentax zooms is marginal and does not warrant making the decision on cost.
The prices I have for my shortlist are as follows:
Sigma 17-35mm 450 stg
Pentax 20-35 499 stg
The price difference on the 20mm is substantial though so the pentax has to be really better than the sigma to justify the difference in cost.
Sigma 20mm 350 stg
Pentax 20mm 679 stg
Contrary to what can be inferred from my message COST IS AN ISSUE, I've been saving up for this for a while, and i'm willing to wait a bit more to make the best decision, as opposed to buying something and longing for the lens I couldn't afford.
Regards
Patrick
- Wide Angle Lens Dilemma kelvin
- Re: Wide Angle Lens Dilemma David A. Mann
- Re: Wide Angle Lens Dilemma Mark Cassino
- Re: Wide Angle Lens Dilemma Okipentax
- RE: Wide Angle Lens Dilemma Rob Brigham
- Re: Wide Angle Lens Dilemma Bob Rapp
- Back from Grandfather Mountain Patrick Genovese
- Back from Grandfather Mountain admin
- RE: Wide Angle Lens Dilemma Rob Studdert
- RE: Wide Angle Lens Dilemma Ed Dombek
- RE: Wide Angle Lens Dilemma Ramesh Kumar_C
- RE:Filters for Pentax 67 55-100 Zoom lens Chuck Riccardo
- Re: Wide Angle Lens Dilemma Patrick Genovese
- Re: Wide Angle Lens Dilemma Bill D. Casselberry

