Paul
On May 1, 2005, at 10:25 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Here's the new link: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3326184 I deleted the original before I pulled my head out of my..........
On 5/1/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Loveless" Subject: PESO and enablement
Can you see any detail in the hair in the negative?No. There is no detail that I can see on the negative.
It looks like it is printed dark for the filter used, which should be used
to lighten skin tones in this sort of thing.
Other than that, I'd like either a bit of space behind her head, or else the
crop tightened up on the left so no background shows between shoulder and
hair.
Agreed. The original was not cropped, so there is no space. So I cropped the left. I also took a little off the top and bottom and cleaned up a few more dust specks.For the most part, I don't really see the need for a subject to be looking
at the camera with either mock joy or angst when sitting for a portrait.
I like your choice of subject position.Honestly, she was working on a photo album and raised her head to look out the window. I didn't ask her to pose for me. I'm horrible at directing people, so I just wait until I see something that looks good to me.Thanks for the comments!
William Robb
I haven't processed film myself in over 12 years, so I'm really starting with no experience. The following photograph is from the first roll I've developed. It's a portrait of my wife taken a few days ago. K-1000, Super-Takumar 135/3.5 M42 mount, medium yellow filter, Tri-X 400, D-76 1:1, scanned, unsharp mask, and removal of most of the dust. That's it. Feel free to criticize, critique, or laugh (at the photo, please, not my wife).
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3326065
-- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com

