P� 3. mai. 2005 kl. 21.05 skrev P�l Jensen:
Mark wrote:
But if you can't afford the full-frame now, what difference does it make? I have considered going Canon, too, but the "full-frame upgrade path" is, for all practical purposes, no more accessible to me with Canon than it is with Pentax. And conversely, the full-frame upgrade path is just as accessible to me now with Pentax as it would be if I switched to Canon!
The point is that they are all constructed arguments for someone wanting a 20D more than a *istDS. It is about rationalization of a purchase. Mind you, I think it is perfectly OK to want a Canon more than a Pentax.
I agree, I just think it�s silly when they think their pictures will get significantly better with another trade mark on the camera and lens. IS or USM are only convenient features, not something that makes anybody a better photographer.
DagT
