Hi Fred thanks for your nice comment. Yes, you are right that the lens and converter are more important than the used body here and you find everything under "details" on photo.net. Photo.net places "Pentax SFXn" automatically below the photo, maybe because it is my "equipment" list. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3344598&size=lg
Of course I would love to have a "real" fixed tele lens in the 300-500 mm range, but I do not have the money right now for a good one and it should be portable (light) and usable without a tripod for me too ;-) I will try shooting some swans again with the M 200mm F4 tele mounted on the A2x-s converter to compare it with the A70-210mm zoom. This would be nice solution too and I wonder if the M 200mm tele will be any better especially in the edges than the zoom. greetings Markus >>Ditto - it's a nice one (who cares if you had to throw a few of the other >>ones out, Markus). >> >>Below the photo is the description of "Pentax SFXn", however. Wouldn't it >>be more relevant to statet that it was taken with an A 70-210/4 with an A >>2X-S teleconverter? (Just a thought...) >> >>Fred
