That's surprising. I'd have thought the newer glass might have been superior in that respect. Some of those K lenses are still hard to beat ;-))
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Marco Alpert > [...] it's also pretty clear that it is much less inclined to blooming > in high-contrast situations (a problem I've consistently had with the > FA 135). > > -Marco > > On May 16, 2005, at 10:19 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > Now that you've had a chance to look at some of the pics, what do you > > think > > of it? The bokeh on this shot looks better than I remember the bokeh > > to > > have been in the pic made with the other 135 yon had. The woman > > certainly > > looks adequately sharp, esp for wide open. > > > > Shel > > > > > >> [Original Message] > >> From: Marco Alpert > > > >> That was the 135 at 2.5 (thanks!). > >> > >> -Marco > >> > >> On May 16, 2005, at 9:49 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Marco .... Was that the 135 or the 150? > >>> > >>> Shel > >>> > >>> > >>>> [Original Message] > >>>> From: Marco Alpert > >>> > >>>> http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso16.html > >>>> > >>>> Comments (of any variety) welcomed. > >>>> > >>>> -Marco
