On 17/5/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed: >I think you're painting a generalization with too broad a brush. There are >several photogs that I know personally using entry level digital cameras - >Nikon D70, the Canon Rebel thing, Pentax istDS, and even some prosumer >models, that wanted and purchased PS CS for some of its features. I >suppose that many people wouldn't spend as much for their editing software >as they did for their camera, but clearly quite a few would and will. Over >on the PS User-to-User forum that situation is seen quite frequently. > >As for the wheels on cars analogy, speaking only for California, there are >many, many people spending a lot of money for wheels and tires, often more >for them than they paid for their used cars. Come on out and we'll cruise >through the Mission District of San Francisco, drive down to San Jose and >environs, head down to LA ...you'll see lots of old Honda Civics with VERY >expensive wheels and tires. Of course, you probably meant the average >family guy or single mother with two kids, not young men who are into >"pimping their ride."
I havn't really thought this through properly. Just seems daft to me... But then again, when do personal spending habits even make sense?? ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
