Herb Chong wrote: > > yes, but what if it is not? also, the dynamic range available when shooting > in RAW and converting with the Adobe Camera RAW is about 0.5 to 1 stop more > than the RAW conversion from the included software. the Canon should have a > touch more dynamic range than typical slide film. getting another half stop > is useful. > > Herb....
It gets down to economics at the moment Herb - I really splurged on the camera - gotta take it one step at a time. I just got a 50mg+ Tif file interpolated from a jpeg in the camera I'm gonna send it to the stock agency to see i it is acceptable in form. Or wait and get a better shot... What I love about the PRO 1 is the 28 to 200 optical zoom.... I seldom used anything out of that range when I was shooting up a storm in the 80's. I gotta go look or a night shot ann > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ann Sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 11:59 AM > Subject: Re: Raw > > > But if I shoot NOT in raw, and my exposures and > > white balance and everything > > are on target - that is as if I had made a "good > > negative" - should't I > > be able to produce a file that will meet the stock > > agency's requirements for > > a digital image now that I have a camera with 8 > > megs?
