Herb Chong wrote: > > don't have OS/2 to install it on, but i do have the Windows NT 3.1 install > disks. i could run it there if i could only get the install to succeed. no > supported hardware anymore. the main reason for going to the Windows version > was better large memory support and also long file name support. other than > that, the keystrokes are embedded in the brain and i don't need to think > about what i have to do in order to do things. same with vi. > > Herb....
I was able to get away with not using VI amazingly, but I feel as you do about Kedit and like to shoot photos the same way -- With a manual camera the "kestrokes" are there... Current challenge with new digital cam is to get the C1 and C2 settings where I want them for maximum quick response time. ann > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:07 PM > Subject: Re: Raw > > > Geez, you still have the OS-2 Version. The last version I had of that > > came in the DOS/OS2 package. I have now Idea where any of that is. The > > windows version is on a backup CD I made years ago.
