I like to present enough information to treat the immediate need and to foster an interest that develops later. I've been doing technical presentations and training sessions for many years; this methodology seems to work better than most others. Anything written down can be found again if you are sufficiently interested.
And I sure don't like being told 'you numbwit, you're wrong because in this one special case that no one here usually has to deal with there's an exception to what you said', in essence. I find that rude and nasty behavior, particularly if it can confuse the message that was being offered to someone else.
Godfrey
On May 19, 2005, at 12:04 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Y'don't need to absorb it all right away, just be aware that it (whatever
"it" is) exists, and when you're ready, you'll at least know about it and
maybe have some basic understanding of the concept.
Shel
the[Original Message] From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Date: 5/19/2005 11:58:38 AM Subject: Re: Raw
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Had I paid attention to the things that were explained here earlier, my
photography would have improved sooner ;-)) I was foolish in dismissing
some of the information presented here.
Shel
My problem is just absorbing it all! ann :)
[Original Message] From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Shel's comment is a perfect example of what I'm talking about in my last response. Presenting an explanation to someone struggling withthebeginning steps of a new technology is a different exercise from
presenting an explanation of in-depth technical detail to someone who
is ready to learn and understand it.
Godfrey
On May 19, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Just thought I =had= to jump in here. At one time I felt a lot ofastechnical stuff discussed here was useless - certainly to me - butthingsI got further into the craft of photography there were additionaldismissed II needed or wanted to know, and a lot of the info that I oncesuddenly became interested in and found a use for.

