I differ with you on how to present the information to someone who doesn't need to know about it/isn't ready for it. You might find it useful to hear things that you balk at understanding immediately, with the notion that you might recognize that the information exists at a later date. Some folks, the majority in my experience, become distracted and confused by too much information presented at once and often I've seen them give up on an endeavor entirely (and I don't mean that this applies specifically to Ann at all).

I like to present enough information to treat the immediate need and to foster an interest that develops later. I've been doing technical presentations and training sessions for many years; this methodology seems to work better than most others. Anything written down can be found again if you are sufficiently interested.

And I sure don't like being told 'you numbwit, you're wrong because in this one special case that no one here usually has to deal with there's an exception to what you said', in essence. I find that rude and nasty behavior, particularly if it can confuse the message that was being offered to someone else.

Godfrey


On May 19, 2005, at 12:04 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:

Y'don't need to absorb it all right away, just be aware that it (whatever
"it" is) exists, and when you're ready, you'll at least know about it and
maybe have some basic understanding of the concept.


Shel


[Original Message]
From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Date: 5/19/2005 11:58:38 AM
Subject: Re: Raw

Shel Belinkoff wrote:

Had I paid attention to the things that were explained here earlier, my
photography would have improved sooner ;-)) I was foolish in dismissing
some of the information presented here.


Shel

My problem is just absorbing it all! ann :)




[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi

Shel's comment is a perfect example of what I'm talking about in my
last response. Presenting an explanation to someone struggling with
the
beginning steps of a new technology is a different exercise from
presenting an explanation of in-depth technical detail to someone who
is ready to learn and understand it.


Godfrey


On May 19, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:

Just thought I =had= to jump in here. At one time I felt a lot of
the
technical stuff discussed here was useless - certainly to me - but
as
I
got further into the craft of photography there were additional
things
I
needed or wanted to know, and a lot of the info that I once
dismissed I
suddenly became interested in and found a use for.





Reply via email to