One more question Paul, you're saying I'm likely to see a visual difference between a JPEG and an "unprocessed" RAW image? The thought had never ocurred to me. It would explain a few things I've been wondering about.
Don > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 2:24 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Speaking of exposure.... > This > is a correct exposure for RAW. If he were shooting jpegs, the > camera probably > would have compensated with more brightness and a bit more > exposure. But since > he was shooting RAW, the meter cut things off at the point where > the highlights > wouldn't be clipped. > > > Paul >
