On 20 May 2005 at 19:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi Ken,
> In Don's image the whitest whites are very close to pure white and approaching
> overexposure. You can see them in the histogram as well. Because they are 
> such a
> minor part of the image, they're only represented by the narrow line running
> across the bottom. With more exposure they would have been off the scale. This
> is a correct exposure for RAW. If he were shooting jpegs, the camera probably
> would have compensated with more brightness and a bit more exposure. But since
> he was shooting RAW, the meter cut things off at the point where the 
> highlights
> wouldn't be clipped. Of course the midtones are all pushed down in the scale 
> and
> have to be brightened. But that's the nature of RAW images. They are different
> than jpegs. That's the point. They give the photographer control. The first
> priority with RAW is don't clip the highlights on exposure. The midtones will
> frequently look underexposed. Don also needs to pull the shadows up a bit to 
> get
> them off the far left just a tad. Once the midtones are brightened and the
> shadows adjusted, the image will probably need some contrast tweaking to
> separate the highs and lows a bit. But the exposure is correct.

This is a great explanation Paul. Essentially RAW files contain all the data, 
the data has to be developed in the RAW convertor in order to resemble a slide 
or print or in camera jpg file. I think the *ist Ds matrix metering generally 
does a fine job of preserving important highlight detail and balancing the 
exposure. My hand held meters (incident/reflected) don't work nearly as 
effectively under scenes with great D range as the integrated metering. 

Film photographers really have to get out of the digital to film comparison 
trap, there is no direct comparison, digital RAW capture a different media with 
different strengths. Also if anyone thinks that in camera JPG can deliver 
anything near the quality of PCR converter RAW images then they should invest a 
bit more time in learning how to convert file and stop stressing about exposure 
and metering.



Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

Reply via email to