>By how much do I have to shift the lens for each shot, is something like a 20% 
>overlapping good?
20% will do. Less will work also. Depends on how exact you are with each frame. 
You just need to have an overlap. Try several dry runs mentally marking where 
each frame falls. Repeat the process for real when you're
satisfied with the positioning of each frame. Its not that hard to pull off. 
Spend time getting your camera level with the world. 

>Is there a better suited focal range than 50mm for that?
Nothing says a 50mm is the ultimate. The answer to this is defendant on what 
you're trying to film and how far away it is. I've done panos with an effective 
450mm (300mm on the *istD) when the subject was far away. I've done panos with 
a 35-80mm.

Hope this helps.
Kenneth Waller

-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Subject: RE: PESO:first impressions from Mt. Pilatus

Hi Cotty
thanks for your comment, you seem to be the only one not suffering from
vertigo by watching the pictures until today :-)
Soon I will post some shots from even more impressive Mt. Titlis here...

A quick question for the panorama pro's here:
I would like to try my very first panorama shot using the A50mm on a tripod
with grade scale. By how much do I have to shift
the lens for each shot, is something like a 20% overlapping good? Is there a
better suited focal range than 50mm for that?

greetings
Markus



>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 5:11 PM
>>To: pentax list
>>Subject: Re: PESO:first impressions from Mt. Pilatus
>>
>>
>>On 29/5/05, Markus Maurer, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>>
>>>I just started scanning some negatives from Mt. Pilatus and next
>>week I will
>>>have the prints from Mt. Titlis.
>>>But my Canon 9900F scanner starts producing yellow/brown dirt around the
>>>edges of A4 or the whole surface and on some spots in the middle
>>too now :-(
>>>
>>>Some of the better scans from Mt. Pilatus:
>>>
>>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3405492
>>>
>>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3405499
>>>
>>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3405486
>>>
>>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3405497
>>>
>>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3405481
>>>
>>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3405503
>>>
>>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3405507
>>
>>Very impressive Markus!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Cheers,
>>  Cotty
>
>>




________________________________________
PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com

Reply via email to