No, it's not a fisheye. Probably 4.0. But I can live with that kind of stop, particularly with a wide where slow shutter speeds are easy to achieve. Paul
> Fisheye?? > Reasonably fast, (better than f4.0)? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >The forthcoming Pentax DA 12-50 will give 18mm rectilinear angle of view on > >the > *istD(S). That's wide enough for anything I shoot. > >Paul > > > > > > > > > >>The problem I see is that there is still no real wide angle solution, > >>unless you go Canon. > >> > >>John Francis wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:47:37PM +1000, Kevin Waterson wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Has there been any more word on the MF Pentax 22Mp? > >>>>Is it just trial or is there a release date? > >>>> > >>>>Kind regards > >>>>Kevin > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>There is no MF 22Mp. There will be an 18Mp within the next > >>>twelve months (larger sensor than 35mm, smaller than 645), > >>>if current plans are followed. > >>>There may be a new low-end 35mm first, but the MF digital > >>>will come out before any follow-on to the *ist-D. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>-- > >>A man's only as old as the woman he feels. > >> --Groucho Marx > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > A man's only as old as the woman he feels. > --Groucho Marx >
