Isn't that why you have two cameras? Swapping them every few shots? In the old days we did not carry a second camera because we were afraid one might break. But so we would not have to stop and change film. Sometimes we would have slide film in one and B&W in the other, but often we loaded the same film in both so we could continue shooting (if we were being paid enough we would have an assistant reloading one while we continued on with the second). The only difference I see with digital is you would have to swap out every few shots so the buffer could flush to the drive. I do believe two istD would be cheaper than one D2H.
graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" ----------------------------------- Bruce Dayton wrote:
You may have misunderstood, I am not taking consecutive shots with a motor drive, these are single shots fairly close together - could even be done without a winder. But you are right in that the kid will grin when you are not ready. It is just that with the *istD and full buffer, you are not ready for a much longer time. You are correct that it is not just a buffer problem. Write speed/compression and/or whatever else it takes is necessary also.
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.4.0 - Release Date: 6/1/2005
