> > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/06/03 Fri PM 02:08:30 GMT > To: "pentax list" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Predictable Pentax > > On 3/6/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >Look through the viewfinder of any dslr. I haven't seen one that's > >better than the *istD. As for the mount, if you had ever used the > >camera, you would know that it works great with K and M lenses. It's > >not even an issue. You tap the green button to meter. Not a problem. > >Easier than metering with many Pentax film cameras. It's interesting > >that you're so adamant about this, but you haven't tried it yourself. > >Very strange. > > Agreed. I held the *ist Ds and the Canon 1Dm2 up vertically side by side > and looked through with both eyes. To me, the finders on both were the > same size and brightness, and the 1D is a 1.3 crop. The *ist D and Ds > finders are way bigger than other offerings. > > Now if you're comparing to a film camera, say the LX, well, then I > suppose you could say that a digi SLR Hoovers in that regard, but I > personally think you have to compare apples with apples...
It's more like the difference between Egremont Russets and Bramleys. One is small, perfectly formed and tasty, the other is big and leaves a bitter taste in the mouth unless you do quite a bit of processing. 8-)))) > > > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > _____________________________ > > > ----------------------------------------- Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/
