That one I don't know, but this one is
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0106/feature3/zoom1.html
--- P�l_Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William wrote:
>
> > You would also have to put up with Canon's
> notoriously sucky
> > bokeh.
>
>
> Absolutely. I wonder what IS do to bokeh. Bokeh is
> very important in a long telephoto lens because
> theres little chance that everything will be in
> focus with such a lens.
> I have never really been a bokeh connoisseur but
> after aquiring the Limited lenses I've become one.
> This lenses have more soul than Otis Redding! Not
> only are their bokeh exxcellent but I would say that
> they are creative instruments. Try get down in a
> flower field with the 77 Limited at close focusing
> distance and you'll know what I mean. This lenses
> suck in air and space in a way I've never seen in
> other lenses. Not only are the Limited lenses
> excellent in bokeh and in the 3D feel department,
> but also most FA* lenses. Both the FA* 600/4 and FA*
> 200/4 macro gives superb bokeh and that three
> dimensional look. Hell, I can spot photographs shot
> with the FA* 600/4 lens by observing the out of
> focus area. Hence, I'm certain that Matthias Klum's
> National Geographic june issue front page is shot
> with the FA* 600/4.
>
>
> P�l
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
> To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
> Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
> http://pug.komkon.org .
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
