>'Course you may have to look at it closer up (zoom) to tell. With the naked eye? >From what distance? Print or monitor? Quality level of the initial image? Quality level of jpeg compression?
Any resaving, I'm referring to was at the highest quality level (lowest compression) from the largest jpeg initial capture. The proof is in the print. Kenneth Waller -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RAW v JPEG In a message dated 6/13/2005 3:57:29 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: FWIW - I've never done an objective study, but the few times I've resaved a JPEG, I've never been able to notice any degradation in image quality. Kenneth Waller =========== I have. A lot. It's quite noticeable. 'Course you may have to look at it closer up (zoom) to tell. Marnie aka Doe ________________________________________ PeoplePC Online A better way to Internet http://www.peoplepc.com
