Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Doug Franklin wrote: > >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:07:38 -0400 (EDT), Kenneth Waller wrote: >> >>> Mike, jpeg, by definition is a compression program. No matter >>> what the setting, when utilized, it will by definition toss out >>> some info. >> >> That's because JPEG is JPEG, not because it's a compression program. >> Many compression algorithms exist that do not lose any data. > >Foe example <drumroll> lossless jpeg! > >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/jpeg-faq/part1/section-13.html
And from that section: "Lossless JPEG has never been popular --- in fact, no common applications support it " -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
