Leon Mlakar wrote:
I am a bit surprised that we all so easily accept and agree with the idea
that the tool we use is a mere disposable item. And that's less than decade
after the cameras were being praised for their durability.
Cheers,
Leon
Less of the "we all". 8-)
-----Original Message-----
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 8:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: *ist D discontinued ?
Its not a ridiculous hypothetical. In the past it was very
common to be able to buy FILM cameras with better buiid
quality that offered no better features or performance than
much lower priced models.
These cameras were durable and build to last.
IMHO, this is not necessary with current digital cameras but
it does not mean that these cameras wont be offered ( i.e.
like a digital leica ?) JCO
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 2:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: *ist D discontinued ?
and I will repost this: "Your argument is based on ridiculous
hypotheticals"
Christian
----- Original Message -----
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 2:36 PM
Subject: RE: *ist D discontinued ?
Read my first word: "IF".
I never stated this was actually the case.
I was just trying to make the point that
I would not pay signifigant amount of
money just for better build quality DSLR ( as I WOULD
in the past for a film SLR).
JCO
