On 16 Jun 2005 at 18:33, Toralf Lund wrote: > Yep. I think those files fit the term "raw" more properly, though. Using > the term RAW when the file has metadata, i.e. contains a lot besides the > raw pixel data, is counter intuitive, IMO. The fact that the so-called > RAW format is actually different for different camera manufacturers > makes the situation even worse. I think it would be a lot better if they > would call the format, say, "Pentax Camera Image" - or similar for other > brands.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I was under the impression that only Pentax used the .PEF extension on it's RAW files, surely that's indication enough. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
