Joaquim Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 19:36, Mark Roberts wrote: >> Joaquim Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >The original image is at least 29040x22338 noisy but good pixels in size >> >or 648 Mega pixels (close to 645 but I guess this must is a coincidence) >> >Who has a CCD like this? Nasa? >> >> If you try to compare film and digital by counting pixels, you have a >> life of confusion and misery ahead of you. > >I'm not trying to compare them, I only mean that so that you could even >think of making a comparison between the film used on that picture and a >CCD you would need a CCD with at least 648 Mega pixels
No you wouldn't. That's the point of the article. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
