32->64 porting is not a big deal, if you have portable code
On 6/18/05, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it's just a question of critical mass. Every time things have changed (8 to > 16-bit to 32-bit, 86 to 286 to 38s, Dos to Windows, etc.) the same stories > have been churned out and the same prophets have predicted doom. > > -- > Cheers, > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thibouille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 18 June 2005 10:53 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: For those considering WindowsXP 64bit > > > > No. But still interesting to notice that a major company does > > not want to get involved with developing drivers for that OS. > > > > 2005/6/18, Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > to install The Only True OS (that is, linux)? > > > > > > but, in the end, canon claims that it's a lousy software company. > > > is that a news? > > > > > > mishka > > > > > > On 6/17/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Thibouille" > > > > Subject: For those considering WindowsXP 64bit > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just read this: > > > > > http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=24004 > > > > > > > > > > We'd better wait... > > > > > > > > It's pretty much a rehash of what Microsoft themselves is saying, > > > > other than the self serving pap from Canon. > > > > I do wonder why I bothered to buy a 64 bit processor, if the > > > > software writers are going to refuse to support it. > > > > > > > > William Robb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ---------------------- > > Thibouille > > ---------------------- > > *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ... > > > > > > > > > >
