Did anyone try one of those WA cards (Write Acceleration)? http://www.lexar.com/digfilm/wa_cf.html
Regards Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 19. juni 2005 05:14 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: Fps and buffer test - Pentax *ist D > The speed of the flash card will have an effect up to the point at > which the camera's bus speed in the io interface to the flash card > surpasses the speed of the card. Doh! I stated that exactly backwards ... the right statement is "The speed of the flash card will have an effect up to the point at which the flash card's speed surpasses the bus speed of the camera's IO interface to the card." Too much editing got it flipped around... the rest was correct. :-) Godfrey On Jun 18, 2005, at 7:46 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Shel, > > The speed of the flash card will have an effect up to the point at > which the camera's bus speed in the io interface to the flash card > surpasses the speed of the card. On a *ist DS, this happens at > somewhere between a 45x and 60x card ... slower cards are > noticeably slower to write than a 45x, but a 45x and a 60x are > nearly impossible to tell apart. Cards faster than 60x write no > faster than the 60x. > > Godfrey > > On Jun 18, 2005, at 10:44 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > >> As I understand it, the speed of the flash card is of little >> consequence in >> the camera, but maybe my memory is faulty on that point. I >> believe Rob >> Studdert made some comparisons on that point. >> >> Shel >> >> >> >> >>> [Original Message] >>> From: Joaquim Carvalho >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> William Robb wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Your camera seems faster than my camera by about 4 seconds. >>>> I wonder if they didn't make an undocumented improvement to the >>>> camera. Mine is pretty early in the model run, I understand >>>> yours is a >>>> little later. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> You're probably just using a slower flash card. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > >
