On Jun 28, 2005, at 1:01 AM, David Volkert wrote:
Michael Spivak suggested the idea of separating the boy from the
rest of the photo by blurring the background. Additionally Jerome
Reyes had a good point that the title doesn't fit the photo at
all. In retrospect I should of left it untitled, I can't come up
with a well fitting title. Here's my take on that idea with a
similar photo taken right after the first after the first (its a
rough draft, I'm too tired at the moment to go through and blend
the blur correctly)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/22099681/
I like it but it changes the subject of the photo, less about the
interaction of multiple people and more about the boy.
Yes, it's a different photograph. Were I playing with this one, I'd
try extending the sharpness range to just include the plane of the
dancers. But all of them work well, they just express different
things.... what do YOU want to express?
:-)
Godfrey
