Sorry folks, I was out of country for a while, hence, referring earlier
e-mails.
Out of curiosity, what is this fuzzy logic ?
Thanks in advance
anand.
>From: P�l Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Pentax - better or not?
>Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:24:39 +0200
>
>I believe Pentax used fuzzy logic back in the Z-20(?) for program mode.
>Anyway, I believe all manufacturers use the way Minolta uses as described
>below. No system litterally go thruogh a database of, say, 100 000 pictures
>to determine exposure. Also, Pentax have used distance informations for
>metering and AF the last ten years and both Minolta and Nikon are newcomers
>in this regard.
>
>P�l
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Pentax Clover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 1:40 AM
>Subject: Re: Pentax - better or not?
>
>
> > Hello
> > here is the answer a friend of mine wish to tell you about minolta :
> >
> > MINOLTA n'utilise pas, comme le pr�tend ton interlocuteur de "base de
> > donn�es" pour la d�termination de l'expo.
> > Celle ci se fait, depuis le 7 xi, par le syst�me fuzzy logic, "logique
> > floue" en Fran�ais.
> > Chaque param�tre de la prise de vue est analys� par l'appareil qui apr�s
>de
> > savants calculs en d�duit le type de sc�ne � laquelle il a affaire.
>Exemple
> > grossier : focale courte, mise au point sur l'infini, premier plan
>pr�sent =
> > paysage. C'est tr�s succint comme exemple car il y a en r�alit�
>plusieurs
> > centaines de donn�es analys�es, mais en aucun cas une comparaison avec
>un
> > stock de sc�nes en m�moire dans l'appareil.
> >
> > In english with babel :
> > MINOLTA does not use, as claims it your interlocutor of " data base "
>for
> > the determination of the expo. That Ci is done, since the 7 xi, by the
> > system fuzzy logic, " fuzzy logic " in French. Each parameter of the
>catch
> > of sight is analyzed by the apparatus which afterwards of scientists
> > calculations deduces the type from it of scene to which it deals. Coarse
> > example: short focal distance, developed on the infinite one, foreground
> > present = landscape. It is very succint like example because there are
> > actually several hundreds of analyzed data, but to in no case a
>comparison
> > with a stock of scenes in memory in the apparatus.
> >
> > See you
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > -
> > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
> >
>
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
