Mark Roberts wrote on 01.07.05 13:39: > Than the answer is "Yes, it's leagues better" :) Actually Mark it was even rated higher (for build quality, flare resistance <of course> and resolution) than non-IS Canon 70-200/2.8 L and Nikkor 80-200/2.8. Test results are in XLS files at the bottom of this page: http://www.foto.com.pl/teksty/obiektywy1_2.html If someone would like to know meaning of some polish words go ahead, I'll help :-)
-- Balance is the ultimate good... Best Regards Sylwek
