P�l,
I think this comes from looking and handling the competitors'
cameras that rival the MZ-S. They are huge and weighty. You have come to
expect top of the line cameras to be that way. Therefore, the MZ-S, when
first viewed and lifted is small.
I have had at least five people who are not into photography -
beyond point and shoot or old SLRs - all comment on the diminutive size of
the MZ-S.
C�sar Matamoros II
Panama City, Florida
> -----Original Message-----
> From: P�l Jensen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 5:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: MZ-S impressions
>
> Gianfranco wrote:
>
> > It is definitely small, and .......
>
>
> I keep hearing that the MZ-S is small but the first thing I noticed was
> how big it was.
> My MZ-S has the same height as my LX (top of prism). However, the MZ-S has
> higher shoulders so volumetrically its "higher" than the LX. The MZ-S is
> about 1cm shorter in length than the LX but its about half a centimetre
> wider (base plate). The MZ-S is volumetrically larger than the LX and side
> by side it also appears larger than the LX.
> People who are used to ME, MX or SuperA won't consider the MZ-S small.
>
> P�l
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
