Powell, I agree that it gives "so much more control", but I would still like to figure out what exactly the *istD is doing when merging those part-exposures.
Besides, the more I can do out in the field with the camera, the less time I have to spend on my ass before the computer screen. :-) Jostein Quoting Powell Hargrave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 01:48 PM 04/07/2005 , Jostein wrote: > > > >This test is probably only scratching the surface of a big issue. > >Maybe it's easier to control it in Photoshop after all...:-) > > I don't get it. Other than the challenge what is the point of double > exposure in digital? > > Two images and an image editing program give so much more control. All of > what Jostein did can be done by duping the background layer and blurring. > The result can be interactively adjusted with amount of blur Opacity and > many other controls. > > Powell > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
