> > From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/07/05 Tue PM 02:57:13 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: OT: another survey > > I'll bet if you took all of the various regions, (notice that they don't > show you how they differ on that map), and weight them by the number of > people living in them we already need 3 planets according to the earth > day calculator. But maybe I'm just cynical.
More likely, it's because many (80% according to the site) of the world's population live much more modest lives in the material sense than we do. To the point where it could be said _they_ are supporting _us_. > > Cotty wrote: > > >On 5/7/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > > > > > >>As we seem to be in the mood for answering questions, try this: > >>http://www.earthday.net/footprint/index.asp > >> > >> > > > >------------------------------------ > >FOOD > >1.6 > > > >MOBILITY > >9.7 > > > >SHELTER > >0.5 > > > >GOODS/SERVICES > >5.8 > > > >TOTAL FOOTPRINT > >17.6 > > > > > > > > > >IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 5.3 > >GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. > > > > WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES > >PER PERSON. > > > > > > > >IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 9.8 PLANETS. > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------- > > > >Let's go find 'em. > > > > > > > >Cheers, > > Cotty > > > > > >___/\__ > >|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > >||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > >_____________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > When you're worried or in doubt, > Run in circles, (scream and shout). > > ----------------------------------------- Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/
