Jens Bladt wrote:

Is it really that much better than the Tokina? I always wanted one, but it's almost 3000 USD here!! And since I'm using *ist D and MZ-S I can't utilize the power zoom.

Oh yes you can. At least with the MZ-S. But you wouldn't want to - not with the price of batteries being the way it is.

mike


Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. juli 2005 22:15
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Love that FA*28-70/2.8


I did a wedding shoot last Saturday and gave my new-to-me FA*28-70/2.8 a
workout. Now *this* is a nice lens! I hadn't been using my Tokina
28-70/2.6-2.8 much when I sold it a couple of months ago as that range
of focal lengths didn't seem to suit my style on digital. But I thought
it might be handy on a wedding shoot. Indeed it is! The 28-70 range on a
DSLR is equivalent to 42-105 on a film camera (big hello to big Bill
Robb!), which covers from small groups to tight head shots. Absolutely
the dog's bollocks for wedding reception shooting! An additional bonus -
and I didn't think I'd ever say this about an FA* lens -  is that's it's
quite a bit smaller and lighter than the lens it replaced.

Oh yeah, and the optics are fab, too! :)




Reply via email to