In answer to your disingenuous question Ken, yes, I've heard of it. In fact
I've (unfortunately) caused it before. Now, Ken, why don't you tell us how
"collateral damage" relates to the attached description of a terrorist?
Remember now, it's called "collateral" for a reason - a reason beyond trite
"talking points".
Regards,
Bob...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose
as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers
with the smallest possible amount of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ever hear of colateral damage?
Kenneth Waller
From: Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
This one time, at band camp, "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The word
"terrorist" is used to denote a person who chooses to instill terror in a
noncombatant populous by destroying innocents such as children, students,
and or a general population regardless of their populous. It's a function
of
intentions..
You mean like the Americans did in Bagdad?
