Wow, a cool example, Rob. 
I would love to have CA profile for my 10x Fuji zoom
:-)
Regards

Albano

--- Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 21 Jul 2005 at 20:07, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> 
> > Interesting Albano,
> > but I think the real comparison to be made is with
> two identical images, one RAW
> > and one hi res jpeg and optimize each one. Thanks
> for posting this.
> 
> I'd not hesitate to suggest that shooting in RAW
> virtually always leads to a 
> better image technically. For instance I just
> stepped outside set my camera up 
> on a tripod, put it in program mode, set my A20/2.8
> on infinity and made two 
> shots, one as a jpg and one as RAW. In post
> processing the RAW image I 
> optimised the exposure and reduced lens CA (I have a
> library of offsets for my 
> lenses) in the RAW convertor and in PS I sharpened
> the image, the other image 
> is straight from the camera:
> 
>
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP2846.JPG
> (3.8MB)
>
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP2845.jpg
> (1.75MB)
> 
> All the EXIF data should be relatively intact so I
> won't add any other 
> technical information. Sorry about the subject
> matter.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Rob Studdert
> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
> 
> 


Albano Garcia
Photography & Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar
 
 

 




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to