I'd forgotten about that, and how wise I once was. Now I've gone and spoiled it by writing another definition which is nowhere near as snappy.
-- Cheers, Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 July 2005 16:02 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: What is snapshot? (Correct Answer) > > Bob, I still like your answer best: > > >> OK, what would you call a "non-snapshot" photograph? > >> (Frostbite optional) > >> > > >Pretentious. > > >The defining property of a snapshot is the absence of pretension. > > I find it agrees pretty well with my concept of a snapshot. > (Once I looked up the woids) ;-)
