On 24 Jul 2005 at 17:50, William Robb wrote: > Your post got me thinking, so I did the math as well. > I'm pretty much there myself, in that technically, the camera has paid for > itself. OTOH, this is just a numbers game, since I would have shot about 10% > of > the frames I have taken with the digital, had I been using film.
And would cost have been a factor in this behaviour? Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
