On 7/28/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Scott ...
> 
> Just what, exactly, don't you like about the photo?

It is too soft.  It almost looks like it's out of focus.
 
> How does the slide look projected or viewed on a light table?

Just about like the web image.  No projector here, so I'm going by
what the loupe tells me.

> 
> Is this a scan directly from the slide?  If so, what scanner did you use?
> How much of what you dislike may have been a result of the lens, how much
> the film (I've heard it said that Sensia tends towards a soft, less sharp
> image - never tried it m'self), how much the processing, and how much the
> post processing?

The scan is from the slide.  Canon 8400F.  I think it's a combination
of both the lens and the film.  This roll contains photos taken with
the FA28-90 and the F80-200.  While all the images were grainy, the
photos taken with the F80-200 were visibly sharper.  Sensia 400 does
have a reputation for being grainy/soft, depending on who you ask. 
Processing was done by Fuji.  Post processing consisted of a little
backlight correction, unsharp mask, resizing, and "save for the web". 
I tried to make the scan look as much as possible like the slide
without being too heavy handed.  My knowlege of Photoshop is very
limited, so I try to keep things simple.

I've been pleased with the 28-90 for print film, but it seems that
even the faster Sensia really exposes the lens' weaknesses.  As soon
as I get my Astia 100 slides back from Fuji, I'll do a bit of
comparison, of course.

Perhaps I'm reading a bit too much into it and should try a few more
rolls before condemning the lens.

Thanks for taking the time, Shel.  Much appreciated.


> 
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Scott Loveless
> >
> > This photo was taken a little over a month ago at Cowan's Gap State
> > Park near Ft. Loudon, PA.  This is from my first ever roll of chrome.
> > Sensia 400, *ist, and the infamous FA28-90/3.5-5.6.  I've heard others
> > voice rather negative opinions about this lens before, but I never
> > really noticed just how bad it is until I got my slides back from the
> > processor.
> >
> > http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=132
> >
> > I have since started shooting Sensia 100 with prime lenses and am
> > looking forward to getting those back to do a little comparison.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com

--
"You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman

Reply via email to