David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I've owned four K2 bodies (up to three at once) but I'm down to one  
>now.  I've never seen the DMD model in these parts but the market is  
>quite small here.  Black K2s are less common (I've only seen one) and  
>the black K2-DMD is reasonably rare and is considered collectible.

The K2 DMD was available *only* in black, IIRC.

>This model is infamous for its film speed setting.  The dial is in a  
>weird location - around the lens mount - and it's been known to be  
>difficult to turn.  I've not had this problem with any of mine.   
>Apparently it can freeze up if it's not moved for a long time.  I  
>think it'd be quite a simple repair though: just a disassembly of the  
>lens mount to lubricate it.

I've heard of people able to free it up with a drop or two of lubricant
without disassembly (though I've always taken it apart to lube when I've
done it).

>Flash sync is 1/125 which is very unusual for a camera of that age.   
>This is because the shutter runs vertically (the K2 must have been  
>cutting-edge technology in those days).  The shutter is quite heavy  
>and a bit noisier than the LX.  Without a battery you get 1/1000th, X  
>(= 1/125) and B.  If the shutter is set at 1/125 or slower it will  
>fire at 1/125 without a battery.  Set it to 1/250 or faster and it  
>fires at 1/1000 (I just judged this by ear with the mirror locked up).

I think this was an early version of the Seiko shutter later used in the
ME. The ME was smaller and the shutter was quieter and had slower flash
sync (1/100 on the ME vs 1/125 for the K2), so I suspect the shutter
differences may be substantial.

>You're sure to notice the weight.  It's the heaviest K-mount SLR that  
>Pentax has ever produced.  Not sure if there are any heavier M42  
>cameras.  The K2 makes a good stepping-stone towards 6x7 ownership  
>(nudge, nudge).

The mass and mirror lock-up (very useful with the K2's oversize mirror)
make this my favorite macro camera.


-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com

Reply via email to