Thanks, Igor.
John
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 03:39:20 +0100, Igor Roshchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would second that.
I've printed some photos on HP 2550n on a letter size, and
it looks much better then home-quality el-cheapo inkjet printers.
The print quality is not as good as professional inkjet printers
or sublimation printers (Phaser).
But it is very good, at least for bright colorful photos,
especially when printed on a good, high-density paper.
At work, we gave up buying inexpensive (even so-called "photo" inkjets),
as they don't last long, - either the head gets clogged or the paper
does not advance.
HP 2550L (letter/A4 size)
can be purchased for $370-450 (in the US), so it becomes more
affordable..
2550n (with the ethernet interface) is about $50-100 on top of that)
Igor
Leon Altoff wrote on Wed, 03 Aug 2005 14:05:35 -0700
Hi John,
I use a HP colour laserjet 2550L (A4) and have access to a 5500 (A3)
and the quality is quite good. Not as good as a photo quality inkjet,
but beter than other inkjets. It helps if you use the Photo quality
paper that HP sells to go with the laser printer. Epson have also
apparently brought out a photo quality laser, but I haven't played with
it.
I gave up on ink jets because the jets kept clogging and I would spend
5 times as long getting it ready to print as actually printing and at
least 5 times as much ink. The Laser warms up and prints with no
problems.
Leon
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
