Hello Jack, That "clears the air" (pardon the pun) on the haze issue. How about the image in general. So far it has met with little to no interest. Your feelings the same?
Thanks, Bruce Thursday, August 4, 2005, 12:04:37 PM, you wrote: JD> Bruce, JD> For me, the haze if a non-issue. JD> The shot "records" an expansive scene holding a JD> natural structure with a shape pleasing to most. JD> Clear air would have only added a lens resolution JD> test. JD> Jack JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Joe, >> >> I appreciate the input. For me, the haze on the >> back hills helps >> emphasize the spatial relationship between them. I >> rather like that. >> Do you feel there is haze on the formation itself >> that is bothering >> you or just the background hills? >> >> Thanks for your thoughts and input. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Bruce >> >> >> Thursday, August 4, 2005, 9:50:03 AM, you wrote: >> >> JT> Re: >> JD> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0483.htm >> >> JT> The landscape is amazingly green after our >> record wet winter. >> >> JT> I have to say, Bruce, that the haze ruins this >> one for me. >> >> JT> Joe >> >> >> >> >> JD> ____________________________________________________ JD> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page JD> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
