Bruce, I sort of inferred a less than enthusiastic reaction by use of the term "records". Interesting geology, but it really doesn't transport me anywhere emotionally.
Jack --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Jack, > > That "clears the air" (pardon the pun) on the haze > issue. How about > the image in general. So far it has met with little > to no interest. > Your feelings the same? > > Thanks, > > Bruce > > > Thursday, August 4, 2005, 12:04:37 PM, you wrote: > > JD> Bruce, > JD> For me, the haze if a non-issue. > JD> The shot "records" an expansive scene holding a > JD> natural structure with a shape pleasing to most. > JD> Clear air would have only added a lens > resolution > JD> test. > > JD> Jack > > JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> Joe, > >> > >> I appreciate the input. For me, the haze on the > >> back hills helps > >> emphasize the spatial relationship between them. > I > >> rather like that. > >> Do you feel there is haze on the formation itself > >> that is bothering > >> you or just the background hills? > >> > >> Thanks for your thoughts and input. > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> Bruce > >> > >> > >> Thursday, August 4, 2005, 9:50:03 AM, you wrote: > >> > >> JT> Re: > >> > JD> > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0483.htm > >> > >> JT> The landscape is amazingly green after our > >> record wet winter. > >> > >> JT> I have to say, Bruce, that the haze ruins > this > >> one for me. > >> > >> JT> Joe > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > JD> > ____________________________________________________ > JD> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home > page > JD> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > > > > ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
