Bruce, I deleted a bunch of earlier posts, including yours. I sent this version of Sub., but it wasn't included in the reply stream. So, in case you missed it, am sending it again for your reaction:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=84 I prefer the depth provided by the more distinct layering, in spite of the blue tinted haze. Jack --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Godfrey, > > I'm a bit confused. I just looked at the raw > histogram with two > different programs and neither of them show anywhere > near > underexposure. I agree that the histogram doesn't > come near the black > or white clip points. So how could it be > underexposed? I'm hoping to > learn something here for future use. > > Here is a link to the histograms. The first is from > Capture One, the > second is from BreezeBrowser Pro. The way I > presented it was without > any exposure compensation. > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/junk/index.htm > > Thanks in advance, > > -- > Bruce > > > Thursday, August 4, 2005, 10:51:40 PM, you wrote: > > >> This is the last shot of Valley of the Gods that > might be worth > >> showing. Since you all have been kind enough to > give me your feelings > >> on "The Pyramid", hopefully you will do so here. > >> This shot uses the haze as a way to convey shapes > and distances. Let > >> me know what you think. > >> > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0479a.htm > > GD> I'd have been more comfortable with this if it > didn't seem > GD> underexposed. The histogram in this one shows > little in way of blacks > GD> and whites, and clipping it with Levels reveals > all the underexposure > GD> noise. > > GD> Godfrey > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
