That's unacceptable to me.  Anyway, I'll soon learn it's abilities and
limitations.  Right now it seems fairly limited.  Thanks.

Shel 


> [Original Message]
> From: Igor Roshchin 


> Having said that, I've been rather happy with the autofocus of ZX-5n.
> It worked fine with the aforementioned Tokina lens, as well as with the
> 50/1.7 and Tokina 17-35 (non ATX-PRO) lenses.
> It was hunting, and occasionally missing in a low light situation
> with my Tamron 70-300 f/4.0-5.6. 
> Usually, when it was missing, - it seemed it was going through the
> right point too fast. In that situation, I would try to bring
> it to the focus setting that is close to the right one, but at a somewhat
> closer distance, and then start focusing. (this could be done by variety
of
> ways - from manual, to focusing on a better lit object first that is
> nearby).
> Well, I believe, both, the body and the lens were responsible for that.
>
>
> By now, I've had my new *istDS only for just about a month, and so far,
> the focusing ability of it seems to be comparable to that of ZX-5n.
> Sometimes I am even thinking that ZX-5n was just a bit better in
> this regards.


Reply via email to