>Furthermore, I would suggest that my 'derisive attitude' has no bearing on 
>the merits or perceived quality of my own photographs

Yeah, I agree. I was chewing on that since I read Shel's post.


Kenneth Waller

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PESO - Splittin Image (My Street Shot)

Derivative... what does that mean?  That it is a tight composition derived 
from a larger whole?  Sure, and done deliberately.  That's a compositional 
tool.  Umm, what photo is not a derivative?

Poor tonal quality?  What does that mean?  What is one often shooting (as 
well as seeing) through when capturing a rainbow?  Rain and mist which all 
tend to diffuse the scene and lower contrast somewhat.  I think this does a 
decent job of capturing the scene through the viewfinder.

Mediocre composition?  Maybe, maybe not.  I haven't exactly decided myself 
on that.  I personally like it better than any rainbows I've captured since 
living here five years.  When a rainbow appears it dosen't last forever and 
the opportunity to change vantage point is pretty much limited to where one 
can go before it fades.

Furthermore, I would suggest that my 'derisive attitude' has no bearing on 
the merits or perceived quality of my own photographs.  If you're judging my 
photo based on something I said, you're not the photo.

The parenthetical title of my photo was not meant to be derisive... maybe 
that's what Paul was referring to as tongue-in-cheek.  In that case he's 
correct.  It's a photo from my street and that's all I intended to convey.

Tom C.


>From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: PESO - Splittin Image (My Street Shot)
>Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 18:40:16 -0700
>
>Derivative, poor tonality, mediocre composition.  These things, coupled
>with a derisive attitude about a type of photography that, because you
>neither like nor understand it, lessens the value of your image and puts it
>more into the realm of a sarcastic comment than a photo intended to stand
>on its own merits.
>
>Shel
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Christian
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tom C"
>
> > > Taken a week ago from the top of the driveway.
> > >
> > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3616155
> > >
> >
> > Now THAT'S "street photography"!!!
>
>




________________________________________
PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com

Reply via email to