Thanks for all the suggestions, all of you!
Oh my god, in the end, I was urged to use my digital camera instead
(limited to focus of 35mm eq.), because there was no time.
Anyway, the results are here:
http://users.pandora.be/vicmortelmans/fts/caroline/index.html
The vertical lines are not what they should have been (even though I
used a tripod). Certainly in the garden, the direct sunlight causes too
much contrast. I think the available light on the interior is very
satisfying, even the shot with the two windows that looks 'burned',
because it's a good thing for a house to stress available light.
Groeten,
Vic
Vic Mortelmans wrote:
Hello,
next week, I'm going to make some photo's of a house interior for a
friend. The house is to be sold and the pictures are to be used as
illustration for the sales announcement. Does any of you have experience
with that?
Some idea's of myself:
- using my widest-angle lens (24mm Super-multi-coated-takumar) to get as
much as possible on the picture
- the lens is not very fast, but has a good depth of field, even wide
open...
- ISO400 color film (no AGFA, got bad experience with that on
granularity; I have some roles of Kodak Ultra, is that any better?)
- camera would be Spotmatic F or Super A (with mount adaptor)... I only
bought the Super A very recently, and I noticed the meter is off, at
least compared to the Spotmatic F; the first roll on the Super A is
still being developed, so I'll need te results to 'trust' it's meter
- using a tripod to take advantage of available light as much as possible
- compensate exposure to eliminate effect of visible windows on the
light meter
- view horizontally, not to distort perspective
Do you think these are good guidelines to produce a quality set of
pictures?
What do you think about using flash? My only experience in flash
photography is direct flash and reading aperture setting from a label on
the flash, based on ISO and distance... I don't really think this will
work out for interior photography, especially since I'll be using very
wide angle and target object distance typically covers a wide range. I
assume that indirect flashlight may help, but I have no
TTL-flash-metering, so no clue what exposure settings to use (yes, I
have the Super A, but as far as I understand, It'll only do TTL with a
dedicated Pentax flash, like the AF280T + an A-SMC lens).
Could I just meter and expose for available light, flash indirectly and
compensate for that with two stops (just a guess), to have at least some
fill-in flash?
Any suggestions are welcome. Once it's done, I'll publish some of the
pictures.
Groeten,
Vic
