You recommended the 20-35 before. I didn't go for that, because zoom-wise, I'm ok with the 16-45. I just wanted a prime lens, mostly because of the size. It's probably psychological, but I still feel self-conscious when shooting people with a big zoom. I understand the 20-35 is compact for a zoom, but still, the 28 should be a lot smaller.
j On 8/11/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 11, 2005, at 10:06 AM, Juan Buhler wrote: > > I gave in last night, and ordered a brand new FA28/2.8 from B&H. > > Should be here tomorrow. > > > > I love the FA35, but it is sometimes too narrow on the istD as a > > normal. Maybe the 28 will be the new standard lens for me. > > > I'll be interested to hear your opinion of it. > > I bought the FA20-35 as my standard lens. Wish it were f/2-f/2.8, but > then it would be too big and heavy. But it's such a good performer, > my interest in the FA28/2.8 dropped: only one stop faster isn't > enough. I bought the FA35 as the two stop advantage is enough > motivation... > > Godfrey > > -- Juan Buhler http://www.jbuhler.com photoblog at http://photoblog.jbuhler.com
