The first version is a bit washed out but the second is too dark. I'm
not sure about the sharpening
either has it's merits.
frank theriault wrote:
As a result of an off-list discussion, I modified this one that I
initially posted yesterday, in two ways:
First, on the original, I sharpened only the jumper, and not the
background, with the result that the background is more OOF-looking
than on the print. On Version 1.1 I've sharpened the whole frame.
Second, I fiddled with levels a bit to darken it. I now think that
the original looks over-bright and over-exposed.
Let me know if you have a preference. I certainly prefer the
"improved" version:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3634511&size=lg
For reference, here's the original:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3631907&size=lg
Thanks in advance.
cheers,
frank
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
