Hi Frank, As others, I'd prefer something midway through both of the images. The sharp one almost looks artificial.
But in any case--I hadn't had the chance to see this the first time you posted. It's fantastic! Excellent photo, and a great example of color that works, somehow it feels like in b&w this picture would not be as strong. Way to go! j On 8/14/05, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a result of an off-list discussion, I modified this one that I > initially posted yesterday, in two ways: > > First, on the original, I sharpened only the jumper, and not the > background, with the result that the background is more OOF-looking > than on the print. On Version 1.1 I've sharpened the whole frame. > > Second, I fiddled with levels a bit to darken it. I now think that > the original looks over-bright and over-exposed. > > Let me know if you have a preference. I certainly prefer the > "improved" version: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3634511&size=lg > > For reference, here's the original: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3631907&size=lg > > Thanks in advance. > > cheers, > frank > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson > > -- Juan Buhler http://www.jbuhler.com photoblog at http://photoblog.jbuhler.com
