John, It just has more snap than is usually seen. I appreciate your reasoning and I would have approached that level as well. The presentation is always the shooter's choice. I like the 'look' on my monitor. What few flat screens I've seen, seem to emphasize edge pixelation which may explain some sharpening criticisms.
Jack --- John Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jack Davis wrote: > > >John, > >Nice depth and texture! > >What was the extent of Photoshopping? > > > >Jack > > > >--- John Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Here is the best picture I took to check out my > new > >>DS. Lens was the > >>FA20-35. > >> > >>And here is the URL: > >>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3699834 > >> > >>Sorry > >> > >>John Graves > >> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>No virus found in this incoming message. > >>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > >>Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/89 - > >>Release Date: 9/2/2005 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >______________________________________________________ > >Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina > relief effort. > >http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/ > > > > > > > > > > > Jack, > I expanded the range slightly using levels, unsharp > mask at 80,.5.1 and > resized it with bicubic sharper for the web. I > wanted to retain all the > detail I could in those rock faces. Is that too > much, or not enough. I > am a not a beginner which makes me slightly > dangerous. Sort of like a 5 > year old with a knife in his hand. > > The ocean is at my back and the crevass you see goes > down about 15 > feet. I am still trying to figure out how to take > a picture of that. > > Thank you for the remarks > > John G. > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
