Vic, Much better! no more pixelization. Now how about using a bit of "unsharp mask" to sharpen the image up. Try adding some until you can see 'things' start to appear in the picture, then back off a bit.
I don't know how your image editor works, but I like to think in pixels. My laptop screen is 1024x768 pixels. By the time internet explorer frames up a picture, I have only 650 by 750 pixels to work with, maybe less. So the best thing to do is to design your images to fit into that standard and show completely on the screen without scrolling up and down or side to side. I'm sure you can work the math from 72 dpi. Regards, Bob S. On 9/18/05, Vic Mortelmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've replaced the pictures by some larger ones. > > One the first publication, I resized the pictures (FastStone Image > Viewer) to be 10x15cm in size at 72dpi, because that's what I guessed pc > screen resolution would be. Why didn't it work? > > Groeten, > > Vic > > Vic Mortelmans wrote: > > My first PESO... > > > > Two pictures at once, shot with different lenses. > > > > http://users.pandora.be/vicmortelmans/fts/050900_Toon/ > > http://users.pandora.be/vicmortelmans/fts/050900_Toon1/ > > > > I selected this ones because composition, light and focus appear very > > nice. I must admit these pictures are selected out of a shoot of more > > than a dozen. > > > > Something that surprises me, is the difference in color. The second > > picture looks quite dull, as compared to the first. Maybe influenced by > > the back light and different moment of the day, or is this actually the > > difference between Pentax glass and Russian glass? > > > > Please comment, > > > > Vic > > > > > > > >
