Lets examine this post - you are stating that I am correct and logical in this premise but that's just a religion of mine I am asking people to follow "vainly" and PENTAX is illogical so **I am insane*** because I don't expect illogical behavior from PENTAX? I think you need medical help if you are serious. And I am dead serious.
JCO -----Original Message----- From: Larry Levy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 10:30 AM To: [email protected] Subject: JCO is right, so ... OK! JCO's premise makes sense, and it would have not cost Pentax any 'significant' money to continue with the enabling of K & M lenses. They didn't do it. Now what? I think one of his premises is falacious. He seems to be attributing logic to their choice of what to include. If recent past is prelude, we should not expect logical behavior from Pentax. Was it logical to pre-introduce a full-sized sensor seemingly based on the MZ-S before being absolutely sure that they would produce such a much-desired (at least within this list) DSLR? It certainly wasn't prudent. Maybe we should treat Pentax like religion. (And to some of us, this might not be much of a stretch.) Then we wouldn't expect it to follow logical laws, and simply have faith. Of course JCO is vainly trying to convince us of the validity of his logic by iteratively presenting the same material in a similar manner. I remember consistently performing the same activity while expecting different results as being a definition of something. Oh well, we all do that at times. Larry in Dallas
